![medal of honor 2010 ribbons medal of honor 2010 ribbons](http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100413204814/medalofhonor/images/d/df/MoH2010boxart.jpg)
![medal of honor 2010 ribbons medal of honor 2010 ribbons](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/01/28/article-1246773-080C58C7000005DC-673_306x328.jpg)
The AF version was in a marked 10/81 contract box of issue. Lordship did hallmark the Navy and Air Force MoH during the 1980's. This name is never seen on Navy reproduction medals because of its difficulty to produce from cheap dies or castings. I must add as an interesting note that the Navy MoH has the designers name (extremely small lettering) on the front of the medal. Also I have not seen any hallmarks on the Navy MoH either. The Navy appears to have a bronze finish/coating as to the gold tone on the Army Air Force MoH. I don't believe that the AF MoH ever had any hallmarks on the reverse. I later kept the Army MOH with one of the more current ribbons on display, and kept the small pad cravat locked up with the rest of the recipient's group. The connection is the one from the ribbon that came with it originally.though it seems a little flimsy. It's in perfect condition.my assumption is that he never wore it as his MOH was presented in 1945 and I think he switched the ribbon to the later style as soon as it came out. The ribbon with the small cravat came from a MOH recipient along with several other items. I was wondering if anyone was going to catch that. I'm assuming that you had two different Army Medals of Honor that were confiscated and destroyed? Also, the connection of the eagle to the bottom of the pad is different on the two medals. Your first photo of the three medals together shows an Army medal with the small pad cravat that was used from approximately WWII to the mid 1950s but your fourth photo of the Army MoH by itself shows a medal with a large pad on the ribbon.